Summit resident Keenan Lanfair speaks during the public comment period. (Photos by Nuha Abdessalam)

More than 100 residents filled the Summit Park District gymnasium Tuesday night filling every seat and standing along the wall and in doorways, as they warned officials not to touch Argo Park.

Many had questions. Many came with the same message.

ā€œWe have history. Don’t take that away from us,ā€ one resident told the board. ā€œGive our kids that opportunity. If we don’t, then we’re going to lose another generation.ā€

The special meeting was called for a community discussion about possible improvements and a potential partnership involving Argo Park and adjacent Argo Community High School. No vote was taken and no plans were approved.

More than 100 residents filled the Summit Park District gym Tuesday night, during a community discussion about the future of Argo Park.

The meeting was held in the Summit Park District gymnasium, 5700 S. Archer Road, and poor audio quality and inconsistent microphone use made portions of the meeting difficult to hear.

Park District Executive Director John Jekot said the district has had preliminary conversations with School District 217 and School District 104 but stressed nothing has been approved.

ā€œThere is absolutely no decision being made tonight,ā€ Jekot said, adding the park is not being sold.

ā€œThe proposal is not selling park land,ā€ Jekot said. ā€œAny agreement would require approval from all governing boards.ā€

Jekot also said District 217 does not own any portion of Argo Park.

ā€œThe high school district does not own any portion of the park and has no authority to sell or transfer park property,ā€ he said.

Longtime resident Rita Young cut directly to the point.

ā€œDo you live here, sir?ā€ she asked Jekot.

ā€œNo,ā€ he replied.

ā€œThis is our community,ā€ one resident said. ā€œWe’re the ones who live here.ā€

Residents repeatedly described Argo Park as the place they grew up.

ā€œWhen we didn’t have anywhere to play, we would go to the park,ā€ one man said. ā€œThat’s why we have this.ā€

Others tied the park to keeping kids safe.

ā€œIf we don’t invest in them, who is?ā€ another resident said. ā€œWe do what we can and the best we can for our children.ā€

ā€œWill there be public access to this area, or are we giving it up?ā€ one woman asked.

Jekot said maintaining access is part of the intent.

ā€œThere is every effort to maintain access,ā€ he said.

That answer did not satisfy many in the room.

ā€œYou take the swings away. You take the little horse away. You take everything away from the kids,ā€ one resident said.

Summit resident Keenan Lanfair said officials were talking about change without understanding how the park was actually used.

ā€œI grew up here,ā€ Lanfair said. ā€œI actually see the condition of the park.ā€ He pushed back on claims that the park is unused.

ā€œPeople act like nothing happens at that park,ā€ Lanfair said. ā€œThat’s not true.ā€

Lanfair said removing equipment removes reasons for children to go there.

ā€œYou take the reason away,ā€ he said. ā€œYou take the swing away. You take the little horse away. You take everything away from the kids because they do utilize them.ā€

He also pushed back against restricting access.

ā€œThere’s no restricted area in there,ā€ Lanfair said. ā€œYou gotta have the same park down here.ā€

Lanfair said officials need to work with residents instead of around them.

ā€œAll we have to do is work with us,ā€ he said.

One Summit resident said residents have already seen what happens when projects move forward without community input.

ā€œThey poured a lot of money into Legion Park. They did,ā€ the resident said. ā€œBut guess what? They didn’t ask the community what they wanted.ā€

ā€œThey did a couple of things for the little kids, but the older kids have nothing to do.ā€

Janice Harvey raised concerns about whether Summit taxpayers were carrying the financial burden while other towns benefitted.

ā€œI’d just like to know, do Justice, Bedford Park, and Bridgeview pay the same property tax we pay for 217 and 104?ā€ Harvey asked.

She said residents deserve clarity.

ā€œIf those three other towns aren’t paying their share, then our property taxpayers are paying for everything while their kids are being bused here,ā€ Harvey said.

One resident reminded board members that District 217 officials are elected by the community and said residents deserve answers before any partnership moves forward.

ā€œWe elect you,ā€ the resident said. ā€œSo, our own high school needs to answer our questions.ā€

The resident pointed to past actions by the high school district that were done without public input.

ā€œA couple of years ago, Argo High School took it upon themselves to put that fence right here,ā€ the resident said. ā€œThey did it without any information.ā€

The resident said the district is now discussing new plans without clear explanation.

ā€œOur high school wants to come in… and they want to put in a little soccer field,ā€ the resident said.

The resident urged neighbors to attend future high school board meetings.

ā€œIt’s very important that everyone here attend the next Argo High School board meeting,ā€ the resident said. ā€œThose are the ones that have to answer this question as well.ā€

Several residents questioned why no one from Argo Community High School or District 217 attended the meeting.

ā€œIf District 217 is so interested in this, where are they?ā€ one man asked.

Another resident added, ā€œOur own high school needs to answer our questions. Not just the park district.ā€

Jekot closed the meeting by reiterating that nothing was being approved.

ā€œNo decision is being made tonight,ā€ he said.

ā€œThis is not the end of this,ā€ one resident said. ā€œWe’ll be back.ā€

The next Argo High School Board of Education meeting is scheduled for 6:30 p.m. on Wednesday, Feb. 18 at the high school.

Summit Park District Executive Director John Jekot describes Argo Park during the meeting.